ANCIENT PORN

It was Agatha Christie, who was nicknamed The Woman with the Dirty Mind.

That epithet, however, did not refer to the sexually obscene, but rather to the murderous offensive. Christie invented filthy manslaughter, to be devoured by her readers as if they had become anthropophagi. Some of her books are quite entertaining, though. Most of them are not; they contain improbable plots and are improbably dull.

Sade might be called The Man with the Dirty Mind, now of course referring to bland and blunt sex of all variety. Then again, he shares with Christie’s long list of bad detective novels their intensely dull boredom. Reading for instance his The 120 Days of Sodom, will serve you as a good medicine against insomnia, written as it is by that Bookkeeper of Sexual Behaviour.

In this Postmodern, oversexed age, if not the pornographic age as such, perhaps all of us become the victims of a dirty mind, of our everyday projections with some sexual overtone. While sitting in the waiting room of the notaire, accompanied by my very sexy immobilière, ready to listen to an almost Sadean long, dull recitation of all the defects of my new house-to-buy, I opened a book on the hospital history of my new hometown – Montmorillon. My eye fell on the picture shown above.

Ancient porn, is what I thought, not yet digitally brought up to date. My first impression was one of a rather oversized Sadean prick – in Chaucer’s apt words: man’s silly instrument – cruelly and anally raping a woman, the whole image done as a so-called postmodern installation, made of cloth, perhaps even a work made by a true feminist, out to shock you – or do whatever. Art, in short.

Only in the second instance was the filthy gaze redirected, the object brought into context, a picture in a book on the history of end-of-18th-century French hospitals. The image concerned a quite revolutionary, visual kind of training, used to teach doctors, surgeons and midwifes, called sages-femmes, the complications of labour and childbirth. Suddenly, I saw the child, where before I had observed that phallus.

La Dame du Coudray made the rounds of hospitals, from Poitiers to Montmorillon, using this display. She even demanded that her show should be performed in public, that is “in front of the Intendant of Health, various persons of distinction and the whole municipal counsel.” So, a public performance of sorts, perhaps afraid that an exhibition of this kind for the true crowd might indeed cause pornographic uproar.

A bit like l’Enfer, that section of France’s greatest public library which was always closed to… the public, only opened to people of distinction such as professors who would bear in mind Dante’s wise instruction ‘to leave all hope behind’. That Hell, of course, contains the most delicious works of pornography, even the complete works of dull Sade. By now, there is no one left even willing to enter l’Enfer – all joyous sexual filth may be found on film or on the internet. Perhaps, there may be still a professor left, willing to enter that Hell of Books, to perform his or her intellectual duties.

Sierksma, Montmorillon 16.7/2020

Author: rjsiersk

Sierksma was born in Friesland, a 'county' in the northern part of the Netherlands with its own language which he does not speak and with an obstinate population to which he both belongs and does not belong. A retired Professor of Social Philosophy and Aesthetics, as a Harkness fellow he taught at Rutgers and Berkeley Universities in the USA, and at GUAmsterdam and TUDelft in the Netherlands. In 1991 he was awarded his PhD from Leiden University on the subject of 'Surveillance and Task: Labour Discipline between Utilitarianism and Pragmatism'. His books include Minima Memoria (1993), Lost View (2002 with Jan van Geest), and Litter Scent (2013). He has published poems and articles in Te Elfder Ure, Nynade, Oasis and the Architectural Annual. Half the year he lives in Haarlem, the other half he spends in la France Profonde, living ‘in his own words’ as the house out there was bought with the winnings from his essay Eternal Sin, written for the ECI Essay Prize (1993). In this blog, Sierksma's Sequences, written in English, he is peeping round his own and other people’s perspectives. Not easily satisfied with answers nor with questions, he turns his wry wit to a number of philosophical and historical issues. His aim in writing: to make parts of the objective world light up in his personal perspective - not my will, thine! Not being a thief, he has no cook, one wife, some children, one lover and three cats. The reader, interested in my writings on aesthetics, literature, and sociology, may want to open Academia.edu, where various pieces are published.

4 thoughts on “ANCIENT PORN”

  1. Maybe porn is in the mind of those who are not used to see the other sex naked as a normal daily thing? I think that in almost all places of the world, things like penis or vagina, or even breasts, are not looked upon as porn, if those that live there are either used to work with it in daily life, like for instance farmers, and i older times most people worked with animals, or they walk around more or less undressed. My statement being, that porn only exists because some, like maybe you, just don´t live a place where being naked is a normal thing. If we were to see each other naked all the time, and other animals, surely this focus on our organs would not be pornografic.

    Like

    1. Perhaps, you have missed my point: it is not being mistaken as to naked and non-naked or even nude bodies, male or female; it is the strange mis-viewing – just for a moment – of what turns out to be a child being born from a mother, made of the same solid brown cloth, as a phallus entering the woman in a lower place than perhaps intended by the maker of this educational tool…

      Like

      1. no, I know what you mean, I just think, that you see what you expect to see, whereas I see a baby being born. Probably because I see nakedness and bodies from a different point of view. In Denmark and as I live on a farm, have animals and children running naked, so sex and nakedness becomes something else, probably more natural. I don´t automaticly see something pornographic in a situation that is not.

        Like

      2. Point taken. However, in my little essay you may also have noticed an element of joyful irony regarding our projective capacities and the existential problems they produce for us.

        Like

Leave a comment